The Armand Rousso response to NYT story by Saul Hansell. Hansell did an article in New York Times about Armand and threw out all types of accusations and slanderous comments. None of which were fact based, it was all just hear say to get a rise and well to try to make an interesting story. Basically Hansell is trying to say that Rousso is a common criminal, when in fact he had one incident over a decade ago that has nothing to do with his current business. He has an open book view on his past and does not try to hide it but Hansell is trying to make a spectacle of the situation just to try and sell himself as a good journalist.
